6 Ways You Know to Test Concrete Field Strength and 1 You May Not Know

Concrete Pouring Image
Concrete Pouring Image

When choosing a method for concrete strength measurement and concrete field strength monitoring, it is important for project managers to consider the impact that each technique will have on their schedule. While some testing processes can be done directly onsite, others require extra time for concrete testing lab facilities to deliver strength data. Time is not the only factor that contributes to project managers’ decisions. The accuracy of the testing process is just as important as it directly affects the concrete quality of the structure.

Summer Campaign Banner

Got the game on? Don't miss a shot with SmartRock® in hand.

Move faster. Cure better. It’s game on with SmartRock.

The most common method for monitoring the strength of in-situ concrete is the use of field-cured cylinders. This practice has remained generally unchanged since the early 19th century. These samples are cast and cured according to ASTM C31 and tested for compressive strength by a concrete testing lab at various stages. Usually, if the slab has reached 75% of its designed strength, engineers will give the go-ahead to their team to move on to the next steps in the construction process. 

There have been many developments to speed up the curing process since this testing method was first introduced. This includes the use of heating blankets, additives, and vapor retarders, etc. However, contractors still wait three days after their pour before testing for strength, even though their targets are often reached much earlier than that. 

Despite knowing that, many project managers prefer to stick to this testing practice because it is “the way it has always been done.” However, that does not mean this technique is the fastest and most accurate method for testing the strength of all their pours. In fact, there are many different practices, aside from cylinder break tests, that can be used. Here are seven different approaches to consider when choosing a method of strength testing: 

6 Ways You Know to Test Concrete Strength and 1 You May Not Have Heard Of

Methods for Testing Concrete Strength Measurement

  1. Rebound Hammer or Schmidt Hammer (ASTM C805)

Rebound hammer test

Method: A spring release mechanism is used to activate a hammer which impacts a plunger to drive into the surface of the concrete. The rebound distance from the hammer to the surface of the concrete is given a value from 10 to 100. This measurement is then correlated to the concretes’ strength.
Pros: Relatively easy to use and can be done directly onsite.
Cons: Pre-calibration using cored samples is required for accurate measurements. Test results can be skewed by surface conditions and the presence of large aggregates or rebar below the testing location.
  1. Penetration Resistance Test (ASTM C803

Penetration resistance test

Method: To complete a penetration resistance test, a device drives a small pin or probe into the surface of the concrete. The force used to penetrate the surface and the depth of the hole are correlated to the strength of the in-place concrete.
Pros: Relatively easy to use and can be done directly onsite.
Cons: Data is significantly affected by surface conditions as well as the type of form and aggregates used. Requires pre-calibration using multiple concrete samples for accurate strength measurements.
  1. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (ASTM C597

Ultrasonic pulse velocity test

Method: This technique determines the velocity of a pulse of vibrational energy through a slab. The ease at which this energy makes its way through the slab provides measurements regarding the concrete’s elasticity, resistance to deformation or stress, and density. This data is then correlated to the slab’s strength.
Pros: This is a non-destructive testing technique which can also be used to detect flaws within the concrete, such as cracks and honeycombing.
Cons: This technique is highly influenced by the presence of reinforcements, aggregates, and moisture in the concrete element. It also requires calibration with multiple samples for accurate testing.
  1. Pullout Test (ASTM C900)

Pullout Test

Method: The main principle behind this test is to pull the concrete using a metal rod that is cast-in-place or post-installed in the concrete. The pulled conical shape, in combination with the force required to pull the concrete, is correlated to compressive strength.
Pros: Easy to use and can be performed on both new and old constructions.
Cons: This test involves crushing or damaging the concrete. A large number of test samples are needed at different locations of the slab for accurate results.
  1. Cast-in-place Cylinders (ASTM C873)

Cast in place cylinder test

Method: Cylinder moulds are placed in the location of the pour. Fresh concrete is poured into these moulds which remain in the slab. Once hardened, these specimens are removed and compressed for strength.
Pros: It is considered more accurate than field-cured specimens because the concrete is subjected to the same curing conditions as the in-place slab, unlike field-cured specimens.
Cons: This is a destructive technique that requires damaging the structural integrity of the slab. The locations of the holes need to be repaired afterwards. A lab must be used to obtain strength data.
  1. Drilled Core (ASTM C42)

Drilled core test

Method: A core drill is used to extract hardened concrete from the slab. These samples are then compressed in a machine to monitor the strength of the in-situ concrete.
Pros: These samples are considered more accurate than field-cured specimens because the concrete that is tested for strength has been subjected to the actual thermal history and curing conditions of the in-place slab. 
Cons: This is a destructive technique that requires damaging the structural integrity of the slab. The locations of the cores need to be repaired afterwards. Concrete testing labs must be used to obtain strength data.
  1. Wireless Maturity Sensors (ASTM C1074)

SmartRock sensor installed on rebar
SmartRock sensor

Method: This technique is based on the principle that concrete quality and strength are directly related to its hydration temperature history. Wireless sensors are placed within the concrete formwork and secured on the rebar before pouring. Temperature data is collected by the sensor and uploaded to any smart device within an app using a wireless connection. This information is used to calculate the compressive strength of the in-situ concrete element based on the maturity equation that is set up in the app.

Pros: Compressive strength data is given in real-time and updated every 15 minutes. As a result, the data is considered more accurate and reliable as the sensors are embedded directly in the formwork, meaning they are subject to the same curing conditions as the in-situ concrete element. This also means no time is wasted onsite waiting for results from a concrete testing lab.

Cons: Requires a one-time calibration for each concrete mix to establish a maturity curve using cylinder break tests.

Giatec’s Solution: Compressive Strength Test of Concrete

The high-tech and rugged SmartRockTM wireless sensors provide accurate real-time calculations based on the maturity method. More specifically, it allows you to collect the concrete’s temperature history, which is used to calculate the maturity index of concrete, enabling you to predict its early-age compressive strength. Keep in mind that the standard level of strength for post-tensioning is 75% and, in some cases, your concrete can reach this level of strength sooner than expected. By employing the maturity method, you will be able to closely monitor when your concrete reaches the necessary level of strength so you can move forward post-tensioning as soon as possible. 

Furthermore, as a non-destructive method, SmartRock requires its sensors to be embedded into the concrete and eliminates the need for time-consuming and costly cylinder break tests. 

SmartHubTM is a remote monitoring system that allows you to access your SmartRock data at any time, from anywhere. These user-friendly sensors are easily installed in the concrete formwork (on the rebar) before pouring to monitor your concrete’s in-situ temperature and field strength in real time. The Hub automatically collects this data recorded by the SmartRock sensors and uploads it to the Giatec 360TM cloud dashboard via LTE. Once the information is there, it gets synced to your team’s mobile devices in the SmartRock app. The Giatec 360 alert system sends smart notifications to let you know when your concrete reaches specific thresholds. SmartMix is a web-based dashboard that enables producers to optimize concrete materials and predict the performance of their mixes. With the SmartMix dashboard, producers can adjust the proportions of their concrete mixes, such as the use of chemical admixtures and the amount of cement. With the help of Roxi™ and access to millions of data points used to train the artificial intelligence algorithm, the dashboard’s suggestions ensure that these adjustments will meet a mix’s designed compressive strength and other performance criteria.

Learn more about concrete maturity here

Summary of the accuracy and ease-of-use of in-place strength measurements techniques

Combined Methods of Concrete Strength Measurement

A combination of these methods for measuring the compressive strength is sometimes used to ensure the concrete quality control and quality assurance of a structure. A combined method results in a more comprehensive overview of your slab, allowing you to confirm strength data by using more than one testing method. The accuracy of your strength data will also increase as using multiple methods will help account for influencing factors, such as cement type, aggregate size, and curing conditions. For example, a combination of the ultrasonic pulse velocity method and the rebound hammer test has been studied. Similarly, when using the maturity method on your jobsite to test compressive strength, it is recommended to perform cylinder break tests on day 28 of your concrete’s lifecycle for acceptance purposes and to confirm the strength of your in-situ slab. 

How to Decide Which Concrete Field Strength Method to Use for Your Next Pour

Tests like the rebound hammer and penetration resistance technique, while easy to perform, are considered less accurate than other testing methods (Science Direct). This is because they do not examine the center of the concrete element, only the curing conditions directly below the surface of the slab. Practices, such as the ultrasonic pulse velocity method and the pullout test, are more difficult to perform as their calibration process is lengthy, requiring many sample specimens in order to obtain accurate data.

As destructive testing techniques, the drilled core and cast-in-place cylinder methods need concrete testing labs to perform break tests in order to get data. As a result, more time is needed in your project schedule when using either of these methods. Comparatively, with the maturity method, you can get strength data in real-time directly on-site, allowing for well-informed and quick decision-making. By reducing your reliance on break tests, you can also avoid inaccuracies associated with testing labs.

Learn more about wireless concrete sensors, like SmartRock® Here

Your decision in choosing a testing method may simply come down to what you know and are used to. However, the accuracy of these tests and the time they take to obtain strength data, are significant factors that are not always taken into consideration as heavily as they should. Think about where all your time and money go during the construction of a project. How much of that is spent on repairs, fees for testing labs, and extra labour to make sure your project finishes on time? The accuracy of the technique you choose can lead to future durability and performance issues of your concrete structure. Furthermore, choosing a technique that takes additional time to receive strength data can be detrimental to your project deadlines, negatively impacting productivity on your jobsite. Conversely, choosing the right tool can positively impact project timelines and allow you to finish the project below budget. How do you decide which strength testing method to use? 

Concrete maturity ebook download

Science Direct 
Concrete Maturity: From Theory to Application
Concrete Network

*Editor’s Note: This post was originally published in April 2019 and has been updated for accuracy and comprehensiveness on June 12th, 2023.

9 Responses

  1. It’s a great source of knowledge; I think it will be helpful for lot of people who are looking for learning more about the 6 ways you know to test concrete strength and you may not have heard. Thank you very much for sharing this article.

  2. I’m glad that you explain how ultrasonic pulse velocity is a non-destructive testing technique that sends vibrational energy through the concrete to test the elasticity, resistance, and density. If someone wants to choose this, it would probably be a good idea to research local companies online. This way, you can learn about the method they use and their experience in order to find one that knows what they’re doing and has the best equipment so that the test results are accurate. You’d probably want to also check their communication skills to ensure they’ll explain the results in a way that you’ll understand.

  3. Active monitoring as that offered by wireless
    concrete sensors is needed on construction
    sites, the monitoring may be started after 10
    hours of casting.
    Obsession of concrete contractors are:
    The casting inhabit accepted ITZs, having
    no ettringites or no DEFas a result of attacks,
    and of balaced curing.
    The resulted data in implementing maturity
    concept are proofs added help to determines
    setting time,ease to create data in cloud and
    plotting s curves.

  4. I have studied the mentioned methods and the concept of maturity of concrete in a Master’s degree program in Kuwait University in the 1986. before 5 years I came to see and know the concrete wireless thermostat and its application.
    Have encountered many colleagues in my life with construction, I unfortunately found most of them have no idea how many non-destructive test methods and applications are available.
    I’m glad the your article addresses this very good to know techniques and information.



  6. I am all for taking human error out of the process of concrete sampling, curing and testing. But as with any in place testing, results can be skewed by placement methods and curing procedures that are out of the RMC producers control. It’s still not an accurate method of the concrete mix designs potential which is what we submit as proven. Thus we would be held accountable for these inaccuracies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Saving Money with Wireless Maturity Sensors

With traditional concrete strength testing practices, that is the use of cylinder break tests, the reliance on third-party testing labs is detrimental to a project’s timeline and budget. While wired…

Got the game on? Don't miss a shot with SmartRock® in hand.

Move faster. Cure better. It’s game on with SmartRock.

Get Real-Time Data with SmartRock®

See how it works today

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience, analyze site traffic and assist in our marketing efforts. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy Page.