The Limitations of the Concrete Maturity Method

concrete pour
concrete pour

As a company that develops and produces concrete testing equipment, we can’t stress how important it is to properly test concrete with reliable equipment. In the last decade, we’ve seen the arrival of real-time sensors that make it easier than ever to gather data and put it to good use. As maturity becomes more and more popular on jobsites around the world, we thought we would shed some light on what the concept of concrete maturity is and what its limitations are. 

Get Your First SmartRock Concrete Sensor for FREE

Giatec SR demo kit_
Giatec SR demo kit_

What Is the Maturity Concept of Concrete? 

As stated in ASTM C1074: Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method, the maturity concept of concrete can be used to “estimate the in-place strength of concrete to allow the start of critical construction activities such as: (1) removal of formwork and reshoring; (2) post-tensioning of tendons; (3) termination of cold weather protection; and (4) opening of roadways to traffic.” Maturity can be used to help your team stay on schedule by avoiding structural failures and making sure that you aren’t doing any of the activities above before your concrete has reached the required strength.  

Temperature v. time maturity method

In The Maturity Method: From Theory to Application, N.J. Carino and H.S. Lew describe the maturity method as “a technique to account for the combined effects of time and temperature on the strength development of concrete.” They also state that it is a fairly simple approach to estimating the in-place strength of concrete elements during construction. With the use of real-time sensors, maturity can be used not only to monitor the strength development, but to predict when your concrete will reach required strength which allows you to plan your project around the current state of your concrete curing. Rather than waiting for laboratories to come back with your break test results, which we know are not always the most reliable, you can depend on fully-embedded concrete sensors to give you maturity and strength data instantly.  

While we know that the concrete maturity method is the best way to predict the early-age strength and integrity of concrete elements, it, like anything else, also comes with some limitations.  

What Are the Limitations? 

It’s important to know the limitations of any tool or method used, especially when it comes to the safety of the workers on a project and the public that will be using the structure. One limitation of the maturity concept of concrete is that the in-place concrete is not always representative of the concrete cylinders used to calibrate the sensors or the equation in the lab. The reason for this is that there are often changes in the materials used in a mix, for example a higher water to cement ratio to regulate the temperature. Still, if you change your mix, you can re-calibrate your concrete in 5 easy steps

According ASTM C1074 and outlined in Concrete Maturity: Concept, Measurement and Application, the limitations of the concrete maturity method are summarized as follows:  

  • In-place concrete is not representative of the concrete used to develop the calibration in the lab. This can be because of changes in materials, water to cement ration, air content, batching method, etc;  
  • In-place concrete is not properly placed, consolidated, cured, etc;   
  • Very high early-age temperatures can lead to inaccurate estimation of strength at later ages;  
  • Using a datum temperature (for the Nurse-Saul function) that is not representative of the concrete mixture can result in incorrect estimation of strength.  

Knowing these limitations allows project managers and engineers to know what to pay extra attention to during ongoing building projects using the maturity method. As mentioned in Concrete Maturity: Concept, Measurement and Application, “routine quality control tests should be performed to ensure the accuracy of the maturity – strength curve. These controls minimize any error in the estimation of in-place strength due to inherent limitations of the maturity method.” Despite these limitations and partially due to the fact that they are easy to overcome, the maturity method is still one of, if not the, most reliable method for measuring and predicting the in-place strength of concrete. 

Sources

ASTM International

The Maturity Method: From Theory to Application

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

cement vs concrete

Back to Basics: Cement vs Concrete

How many times have you heard people use the words cement and concrete interchangeably? Probably enough for you to wonder if there is a difference at all. While there are some ways in which the terms are related, the answer is simple: concrete and cement are fundamentally different. In this blog we will discuss all you need to know to answer the question: cement vs concrete, are they different?

concrete testing lab

Revolutionizing Third-Party Concrete Testing with SmartRock® Wireless Sensors

Often, third-party testing agencies face several challenges with standard temperature and strength monitoring systems. Some of these involve relying on multiple wired components and expensive concrete monitoring systems. Subsequently, concrete testing lab facilities require extra time to produce accurate data, and this presents a burden when contractors need this information right away.  Get Your First SmartRock Concrete Sensor for FREE Free Demo Kit How Can Technicians Solve This Challenge? SmartRock is the world’s leading wireless sensor for monitoring concrete curing and hardening. This fully embedded sensor…

Book your meeting with us at World of Concrete,
January 17-19, 2023

The Big 5

Book your meeting with us at The Big 5, December 5-8

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience, analyze site traffic and assist in our marketing efforts. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy Page.