Dallas Bridge Margaret McDermott Eliminates Testing to Save Money

Margaret Mcdermott Bridge Construction

Photo by Art Davis, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 

SmartRock™ Plus Sensor
*For eligible new customers only

Get a Free Trial Kit

  • Free Sensor*
  • Free Shipping
  • No Strings

The Margaret McDermott Dallas Bridge over the Trinity River in Dallas, Texas was intended to replace the I-30 bridge built in the late 50s to early 60s. The bridge cost over $100 million to build and features a design resembling a suspension bridge. The part of the bridge designed for pedestrians and cyclists was supposed to open in 2017, but it remains closed. Now, it is going to take two more years and $7 million dollars more before pedestrians will be allowed to use the bridge.  

Why did this disastrous result happen? The simple answer is a lack of bridge testing. In order to lower costs, the hike and bike bridges used value engineering to cut costs by $3 million. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, value engineering is “the process of reducing the cost of producing a product without reducing its quality or how effective it is.” However, in this case, an important cable testing was skipped to save $30,000, despite the fact that strong winds are predominant in this area. After the cables were attached, heavy winds caused them to vibrate and twist, which caused several cable anchor rods to crack and fail (The Dallas Morning News). 

This issue has created a lengthy back-and-forth between the architect (Santiago Calatrava), city officials, and the Texas Department of Transportation. There is a lot of finger pointing when it comes to who is to blame for putting off proper testing. Calatrava states they pushed the city of Dallas to do the proper testing and even offered to front the costs, but it was not done.  Still, officials at City Hall and the Texas Department of Transportation have put the blame back on Calatrava. 

For now, the two cable-stayed structures of the Margaret McDermott Dalla Bridge system remain closed as no one is willing to certify that they are safe for use. Clearly, the $30,000 saved by skipping bridge testing did not pay off, and ended up costing the city way more than they planned for.  

Lessons Learned  

Photo of iCOR being used on concrete

When it comes to bridge testing, do not cut corners. Investing in a thorough, accurate method of testing can save you money and stress in the long run. Furthermore, after the bridge is built, do not forget to continue testing for damage and deterioration. Options for bridge testing include: visual inspection, acoustical techniques, infrared/thermal imaging inspection, coring and chipping, and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). If you are looking for a non-destructive technique to detect the rate of corrosion in your structure, check out our award-winning device iCOR®. This tool uses our patented Connectionless Electrical Pulse Response Analysis (CEPRA) technology to perform three-in-one concrete testing measurements of: rebar corrosion rate, half-cell potential, and in-situ electrical resistivity. Finally, if you need to conduct a half-cell potential test according to ASTM C876, check out XCell™

Click here for an analysis of each of the testing methods mentioned! 


Cambridge Dictionary


D Magazine

The Dallas Morning News

*Editor’s Note: This post was originally published in February 2018 and has been updated for accuracy and comprehensiveness. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

giatec award for best paper

Giatec Award for Best Paper

We are very excited to announce the launch of our annual research paper contest! This is a great opportunity for civil-engineers to expose their research and development to a global audience of industry experts. Plus, the…

Schematic representation of service-life stages for structures exposed to chloride-induced corrosion risk

Analyzing Corrosion in Reinforced Concrete Structures

Reinforced concrete structures have shaped our cities for thousands of years, from historical buildings stretching as far back as the Romans to present day, such as the 3-storey parking garage adjacent to the mega shopping mall…

Concrete Robot

Concrete-Eating Robots – The Future of Recycling Old Buildings

The process of demolishing a building involves heavy machinery to crush concrete and separate valuable materials that can be reused. Current methods consume quite a significant amount of time and money in order to safely disassemble the building, extract parts, and transport the materials to off-site centers…


Why Measure Concrete Resistivity?

Concrete is a porous material which contains microscopic voids known as pores. These pores range in size, vary in connectivity (pore structure) and can be added to the concrete via air-entraining admixtures. The water-to-cementitious material and…

completed road

Open Roads Sooner with Concrete Curing Sensors

Road construction can be a lengthy, disruptive process—so ensuring that your project stays on schedule is one of your most important responsibilities as a project manager. Even before groundwork can be begin, the planning stages of…

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience, analyze site traffic and assist in our marketing efforts. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy Page.